Ìs it also what you are hoping for?
Deadpool himself, Ryan Reynolds has expressed interest in a crossover between Deadpool and the Avengers. Though both are a part of the Marvel family, Deadpool is not included in the Marvel Cinematic Universe and is owned by Fox, thus being separated on the big screen, save for references and jokes courtesy of Deadpool. The recent partnership between Marvel and Sony Pictures Entertainment produced the latest Spidey film, Spider-Man: Homecoming, renewing the hopes that Fox could possibly also collaborate with Marvel down the line. Indeed, a lot of great comic book story material still has not been done on the big screen because they involve characters from the separate shared universe. This potential hasn’t passed Reynolds by as even he gets giddy on the thought of Deadpool having some interaction with the Avengers.
In a newly published interview with Total Film (via Comic Book Movie), Ryan Reynolds was asked if he would like to one day see the Merc With a Mouth go toe to toe with the Avengers. His response was quick and enthusiastic:
“That sounds like a great idea but a very expensive idea. Can you imagine the s**t-talking contest with Iron Man? Oh, that would be great. But it would have to be rated R to completely unharness everybody. Unbridle the merriment and watch them go …”
20th Century Fox may have found success with R-rated superhero movies like Deadpool and Logan, but it seems unlikely that the family-friendly Marvel Studios and its parent company Disney would be interested in going R-rated with the popular Avengers franchise. Maybe Reynolds can make it happen while hosting Saturday Night Live for a skit, but the big screen does not seem like an option.
Another point that Ryan Reynolds brought up was the cost of a movie that would contain them all. Sony’s deal with the MCU had slightly less leverage as this was to be a reboot of the Spider-Man universe, but Deadpool was an out of left field box office success, which would mean a lot more leverage on Fox’s part. But that’s not to totally crush the dreams of the crossover ever happening because anything is possible, but this just seems highly improbable and next to impossible.
Regardless of the hurdles, Reynolds continues to remain true to his superhero character and playfully take a shot the glaring separation. When Josh Brolin was first announced as Cable for Deadpool 2, he questioned its legitimacy and pointed out that he “can’t play 2 characters in the same universe.” Brolin, of course, is also playing a pivotal role in next year’s Avengers: Infinity War and its sequel as the main bad guy – Mad Titan Thanos.
So, your idea is greatly tempting, but hardly possible, Ryan.
James Gun revealed that the movie could start filming by the end of 2018.
Prior to its launch, Gunn made the announcement that he would return to direct the third installment after previously showing some hesitancy to return. He’s already been working on the script and hinted towards a 2020 release, and now revealed it could start filming by the end of 2018.
James Gunn recently spoke with Collider in honor of the upcoming home video release of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, which will be the first ever Disney movie to be released in 4K Ultra HD, as well as the standard Blu-ray/DVD release on August 22. During the course of the conversation, he said that it will be “a little more than year” until filming on Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, which he says will probably be the title of the movie unless something changes, will begin. But he is currently writing the script and, as he tells it, things are going great. Here’s what director James Gunn had to say about it.
“It’s been pretty easy. The truth is, the first movie is the first act, the second movie is the second act, and the third movie is the third act so I’m tying a lot of stuff together in the third film. We get a lot of answers on a lot of different things, so doing that in an elegant way takes a little bit of grace and elegance. It’s more challenging in that respect writing the third movie than the second movie.”
Ever since it was officially confirmed that Gunn was returning for Vol. 3, there has been heavy speculation that Marvel will keep the Guardians in the prime May slot in 2020. However, Marvel’s production schedule has also typically meant a film starts production roughly a year ahead of its release. Gunn’s timetable does have plenty of leeway with a late 2018 or early 2019 start fitting his guidelines, but a start in 2018 could make a late 2019 release possible.
The final installment will follow the same thorough process Gunn goes through when developing each of his films. “I do an incredibly in-depth treatment for every movie,” Gunn said. “I think of writing a screenplay as creating the body of a human being and you’ve got to start with the skeleton, start with the bones, and you create the bones. You take a lot of time because that’s the actual base of the movie and if you screw that part up, later on down the line, you’re going to have a lot of mistakes. So by creating a really strong foundation for the story, that’s the most important thing. So I write a good treatment that’s probably about 70 pages long. It includes photographs and things like that. So that has been the way I’ve dealt with every movie and this one as well.”
The Guardians of the Galaxy will meet up with Thor before joining the rest of the Avengers in Infinity War, due out May 8, 2018. There’s no projected release date for Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3.
Reviews of the sci-fi blockbuster, released in the U.S. Friday, range from scathing to downright obliterating.
The embargo has lifted for reviews on Sony Pictures’ The Dark Tower and the critical consensus can charitably be summed up with one word: meh. The Dark Tower is currently rated a lowly 18 percent on the divisive review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes. That’s far below the 51 percent scored by Luc Besson’s ambitious sci-fi thriller Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets, one of the summer’s biggest box office misfires.
Directed and co-written by Nikolaj Arcel, the film stars Idris Elba as Roland Deschain, a gunslinger on a quest to protect the Dark Tower, a mythical structure which supports all realities, and Matthew McConaughey as his nemesis, Walter o’Dim, the “Man in Black”.
While it will be very interesting to see how the film performs at the box office this weekend, it’s clear that The Dark Tower won’t be winning any Academy Awards. Here are what the critics are saying.
IGN – Marty Silva
“The deeply flawed and compellingly tragic characters that King created are one-dimensional in their on-screen adaptations because the motivations that give them that depth are completely lost to the wind. That’s not to say the performances are bad – in fact, I absolutely adore the casting of the leads. […] But there’s no meat on the bone of the script for arguably two of the finest actors of our time to really dig in and give us something we haven’t seen before.”
Birth Movies Death – Scott Wampler
“The Dark Tower is a deeply flawed movie. It’s a film that feels rushed and plodding, sometimes within the same scene. It’s a film that saddles two of our greatest working actors with clunky dialogue and muddled motivations. It’s a film that feels claustrophobic and oddly contained when it should’ve felt sweeping and epic. After decades of waiting, after months of keeping our fingers crossed and hoping for the best, it brings me zero pleasure to report that The Dark Tower doesn’t really work.
Indie Wire – Kate Erbland
“Fans of King’s books will likely be disappointed by the way this long-awaited film adaptation speeds through essential plot points and frantically introduces characters with little in the way of rhythm or care, all in service of a rushed finale that will leave plenty scratching their heads. A tight story is one thing, but a 95-minute feature that is unable to give even the slightest inkling that it’s based on a grand-scale epic masterpiece is something else entirely. The whole universe is at stake here, but “The Dark Tower” wastes precious little time before it delivers any big moments, mostly care of listless action sequences that barely get moving before they’re cut short.”
The Wrap – Dan Callahan
“Most of the scenes in “The Dark Tower” feel like a desperate compromise of some kind, and often there seem to be scenes missing that would simply get us from one point to another. With fantasy material like this, we need to be made to believe in the inventions and the conceits, and we cannot do that if they are shot and staged in such a truncated and perfunctory way.”
THR – John DeFore
“Though far from the muddled train wreck we’ve been led to expect, this Tower lacks the world-constructing gravitas of either the Tolkien books that inspired King or the franchise-launching movies that Sony execs surely have in mind. Though satisfying enough to please many casual moviegoers drawn in by King’s name and stars Idris Elba and Matthew McConaughey, it will likely disappoint many serious fans and leave other newbies underwhelmed.”
Collider – Matt Goldberg
“The Dark Tower doesn’t even really do us the courtesy of being laughably bad. That would take some level of ambition, which the movie studiously avoids at almost every turn. Instead, it simply exists, eager to be overlooked and forgotten. It’s a shame that this adaptation didn’t have the funding or the vision to be something remarkable because you can see glimmers of a more ambitious, exciting movie. Sadly, Arcel approaches the story with a flat, uninteresting style, never daring to challenge his audience, invest in his characters, or give us a reason to care. The Dark Tower doesn’t fall because of a child’s mind. It falls because it’s too embarrassed to stand.”